Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Chinese Taipei: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
90
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
90
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
14th
Chinese Taipei rank
14th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 90 against 90 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 14th and Chinese Taipei ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38 | 70 | 32 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 57 | 86 | 29 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Chinese Taipei?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 90 against 90 in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Chinese Taipei rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 14th and Chinese Taipei ranks 14th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.