Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia
Croatia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 50 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia stood at 50. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 66.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia peaked at 50 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 10, in 2005.
Croatia ranks 113th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 10 | — |
| 2006 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 30 | +200.0% |
| 2010 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 50 | +66.7% |
| 2017 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 50 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14 | 10 | 30 | 5 |
| 2010s | 38 | 30 | 50 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
- 113 Brazil 50 compare
- 113 Austria 50 compare
- 113 Costa Rica 50 compare
- 113 Dominican Republic 50 compare
- 113 Germany 50 compare
- 113 Guyana 50 compare
- 113 Kuwait 50 compare
- 113 Latvia 50 compare
- 113 Montenegro 50 compare
- 113 Mozambique 50 compare
- 113 Namibia 50 compare
- 113 Papua New Guinea 50 compare
- 113 Samoa 50 compare
- 113 Slovenia 50 compare
- 113 East Timor 50 compare
- 113 Vanuatu 50 compare
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Croatia was 50 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 50 in 2016.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 10 in 2005.
- How does Croatia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Croatia ranks 113th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.