Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor
East Timor: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 50 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
East Timor recorded 50 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor peaked at 50 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2005.
East Timor ranks 113th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 50 | — |
| 2006 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 50 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 5 |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 10 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 113 Brazil 50 compare
- 113 Austria 50 compare
- 113 Costa Rica 50 compare
- 113 Croatia 50 compare
- 113 Dominican Republic 50 compare
- 113 Germany 50 compare
- 113 Guyana 50 compare
- 113 Kuwait 50 compare
- 113 Latvia 50 compare
- 113 Montenegro 50 compare
- 113 Mozambique 50 compare
- 113 Namibia 50 compare
- 113 Papua New Guinea 50 compare
- 113 Samoa 50 compare
- 113 Slovenia 50 compare
- 113 Vanuatu 50 compare
More reference data data for East Timor
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 17.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4255 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2854 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0096 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 171.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 112.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 41.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 75.64 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in East Timor was 50 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 50 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2005.
- How does East Timor rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- East Timor ranks 113th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.