Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Kenya
Kenya: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 10 0-10 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Kenya, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Kenya is 10 0-10, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 400.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Kenya peaked at 10 0-10 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 2 0-10, in 2005.
That places Kenya 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Kenya, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5 0-10 | +150.0% |
| 2017 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 10 0-10 | +100.0% |
| 2019 | 10 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 10 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Kenya
- 1 Cambodia 10 0-10 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 10 0-10 compare
- 4 Canada 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Israel 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Kuwait 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Malaysia 9 0-10 compare
- 4 New Zealand 9 0-10 compare
- 4 North Macedonia 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Rwanda 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Saudi Arabia 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Singapore 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Slovenia 9 0-10 compare
- 4 Trinidad and Tobago 9 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Kenya
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 58.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 68.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.05 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Kenya?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Kenya was 10 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Kenya?
- The highest recorded value was 10 0-10 in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Kenya?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Kenya rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Kenya ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Kenya?
- Over the last ten years it is up 400.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kenya data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of director liability index measures when board members can be held liable for harm caused by related-party transactions and what sanctions are available. It has seven components: (i) whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (ii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold Mr. James liable for the damage the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company; (iii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold other executives and directors (the CEO, members of the board of directors or members of the supervisory board) liable for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (iv) whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (v) whether Mr. James repays profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (vi) whether Mr. James is disqualified upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; and (vii) whether a court can void the transaction upon a successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff.