Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 20 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Russian Federation, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Russian Federation is 20, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Russian Federation peaked at 20 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.
That places Russian Federation 143rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | — |
| 2006 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 20 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 20 | 5 |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 20 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 143 Argentina 20 compare
- 143 Australia 20 compare
- 143 Barbados 20 compare
- 143 Belarus 20 compare
- 143 Bulgaria 20 compare
- 143 Guatemala 20 compare
- 143 Morocco 20 compare
- 143 Poland 20 compare
- 143 Qatar 20 compare
- 143 San Marino 20 compare
- 143 Ukraine 20 compare
- 143 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 20 compare
- 143 Zimbabwe 20 compare
More reference data data for Russian Federation
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 31.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 129.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 26.88 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Russian Federation?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Russian Federation was 20 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- How does Russian Federation rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Russian Federation ranks 143rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.