Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Belarus

Belarus: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 20 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
20
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
143rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
30
in 2005
All-time low
0
in 2007
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Belarus, 2005–2019

01020302005201220192005: 302006: 302007: 02008: 02009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 02014: 02015: 02016: 202017: 202018: 202019: 20

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Belarus is 20, measured in 2019.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Belarus peaked at 30 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2007.

Belarus ranks 143rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score in Belarus, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 30
2006 30 +0.0%
2007 0 -100.0%
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 20
2017 20 +0.0%
2018 20 +0.0%
2019 20 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12 0 30 5
2010s 8 0 20 10

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 143 Russian Federation 20 compare
  2. 143 Argentina 20 compare
  3. 143 Australia 20 compare
  4. 143 Barbados 20 compare
  5. 143 Bulgaria 20 compare
  6. 143 Guatemala 20 compare
  7. 143 Morocco 20 compare
  8. 143 Poland 20 compare
  9. 143 Qatar 20 compare
  10. 143 San Marino 20 compare
  11. 143 Ukraine 20 compare
  12. 143 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 20 compare
  13. 143 Zimbabwe 20 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Belarus?
Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Belarus was 20 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2007.
How does Belarus rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
Belarus ranks 143rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Belarus. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10-score/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10-score/belarus/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,865 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.