Russian Federation vs San Marino: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Russian Federation
20
in 2019
San Marino
20
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
143rd
San Marino rank
143rd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 20 against 20 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 143rd and San Marino ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Russian Federation or San Marino?
- Russian Federation, at 20 against 20 in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Russian Federation and San Marino?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and San Marino?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and San Marino rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Russian Federation ranks 143rd and San Marino ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.