Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China is 5 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Hong Kong, China ranks 53rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
- 52 United States of America 5.4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Pakistan 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Japan 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Argentina 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Belarus 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Botswana 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Colombia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Croatia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Estonia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Hungary 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Jamaica 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Kenya 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Mauritius 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Netherlands 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 New Zealand 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Panama 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Peru 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Puerto Rico 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Romania 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Singapore 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Slovenia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 South Africa 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Sri Lanka 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Switzerland 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Tunisia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Uganda 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 United Arab Emirates 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Viet Nam 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Hong Kong, China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4132 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0219 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 11.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 4.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2428 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Hong Kong, China was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and directorships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.