Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa
South Africa: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa stood at 5 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places South Africa 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 52 United States of America 5.4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Pakistan 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Japan 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Argentina 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Belarus 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Botswana 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Colombia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Croatia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Estonia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Hong Kong, China 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Hungary 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Jamaica 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Kenya 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Mauritius 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Netherlands 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 New Zealand 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Panama 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Peru 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Puerto Rico 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Romania 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Singapore 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Slovenia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Sri Lanka 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Switzerland 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Tunisia 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Uganda 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 United Arab Emirates 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 53 Viet Nam 5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for South Africa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7468 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 63.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.07 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in South Africa was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does South Africa rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- South Africa ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and directorships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.