Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland stood at 8 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 24th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- 24 Japan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Antigua and Barbuda 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Armenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Australia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Azerbaijan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bahamas 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Belarus 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Brunei Darussalam 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bulgaria 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Colombia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Costa Rica 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Denmark 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominica 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominican Republic 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Finland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Grenada 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Guyana 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Iceland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kiribati 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Korea 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malaysia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Maldives 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malta 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Marshall Islands 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Micronesia, Federated States of 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Moldova 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Mongolia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Norway 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Panama 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Puerto Rico 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 San Marino 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Slovenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 South Africa 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Kitts and Nevis 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Lucia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Tanzania, United Republic of 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Trinidad and Tobago 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Uruguay 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 10.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 59.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.48 (2050)
All data for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland →
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- The lowest recorded value was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence and recover legal expenses. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit. Alternatively, whether they can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (ii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iii) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (iv) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial; (v) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases; and (vi) whether shareholder plaintiffs can recover their legal expenses from the company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.