Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Micronesia, Federated States of
Micronesia, Federated States of: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Micronesia, Federated States of, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Micronesia, Federated States of recorded 8 DB15-20 methodology for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places Micronesia, Federated States of 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Micronesia, Federated States of, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Micronesia, Federated States of
- 24 Japan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Antigua and Barbuda 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Armenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Australia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Azerbaijan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bahamas 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Belarus 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Brunei Darussalam 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bulgaria 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Colombia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Costa Rica 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Denmark 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominica 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominican Republic 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Finland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Grenada 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Guyana 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Iceland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kiribati 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Korea 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malaysia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Maldives 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malta 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Marshall Islands 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Moldova 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Mongolia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Norway 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Panama 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Puerto Rico 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 San Marino 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Slovenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 South Africa 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Kitts and Nevis 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Lucia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Tanzania, United Republic of 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Trinidad and Tobago 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Uruguay 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Micronesia, Federated States of
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 16.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 20.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0018 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 16.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0074 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Micronesia, Federated States of was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- The lowest recorded value was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Micronesia, Federated States of rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia, Federated States of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence and recover legal expenses. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit. Alternatively, whether they can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (ii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iii) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (iv) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial; (v) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases; and (vi) whether shareholder plaintiffs can recover their legal expenses from the company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.