Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica stood at 8 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of up 166.7% over ten years.
That places Costa Rica 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +166.7% |
| 2018 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 8 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 24 Japan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Antigua and Barbuda 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Armenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Australia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Azerbaijan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bahamas 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Belarus 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Brunei Darussalam 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Bulgaria 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Colombia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Denmark 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominica 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Dominican Republic 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Finland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Grenada 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Guyana 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Iceland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kiribati 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Korea 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Kyrgyzstan 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malaysia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Maldives 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Malta 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Marshall Islands 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Micronesia, Federated States of 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Republic of Moldova 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Mongolia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Norway 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Panama 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Puerto Rico 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 San Marino 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Slovenia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 South Africa 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Kitts and Nevis 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Lucia 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Tanzania, United Republic of 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Trinidad and Tobago 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 24 Uruguay 8 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Costa Rica was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB15-20 methodology in 2017.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Costa Rica rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Costa Rica ranks 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 166.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence and recover legal expenses. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit. Alternatively, whether they can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (ii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iii) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (iv) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial; (v) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases; and (vi) whether shareholder plaintiffs can recover their legal expenses from the company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.