Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan
Taiwan: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan is 6 DB06-14 methodology, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 20.0% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan peaked at 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013 and was at its lowest, 5 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.
That places Taiwan 78th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 5 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 DB06-14 methodology | 5 DB06-14 methodology | 5 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 5.25 DB06-14 methodology | 5 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan
- 78 Russian Federation 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Angola 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Argentina 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Austria 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Barbados 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Belize 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bhutan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cape Verde 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Chile 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cyprus 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ecuador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 El Salvador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Estonia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Eswatini 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Italy 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Liberia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Lithuania 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Montenegro 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Morocco 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Namibia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Netherlands 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Nicaragua 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Paraguay 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Peru 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Sao Tome and Principe 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Sierra Leone 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tajikistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tunisia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Türkiye 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uganda 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ukraine 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uzbekistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Taiwan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 360.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 111.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 46.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,323 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 400.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 306.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 2,013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Taiwan was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Taiwan?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Taiwan?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- How does Taiwan rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Taiwan ranks 78th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Taiwan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Taiwan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.