Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▼ Falling
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone stood at 6 DB06-14 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of down 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone peaked at 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 6 DB06-14 methodology, in 2009.
That places Sierra Leone 78th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | -25.0% |
| 2010 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 8 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 78 Russian Federation 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Angola 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Argentina 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Austria 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Barbados 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Belize 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bhutan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cape Verde 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Chile 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cyprus 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ecuador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 El Salvador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Estonia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Eswatini 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Italy 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Liberia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Lithuania 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Montenegro 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Morocco 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Namibia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Netherlands 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Nicaragua 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Paraguay 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Peru 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Sao Tome and Principe 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Taiwan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tajikistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tunisia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Türkiye 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uganda 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ukraine 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uzbekistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Sierra Leone was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 8 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2009.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 78th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.