Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation stood at 6 DB06-14 methodology. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation peaked at 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 6 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.
Russian Federation ranks 78th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 6 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 78 Angola 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Argentina 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Austria 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Barbados 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Belize 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bhutan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cape Verde 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Chile 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Cyprus 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ecuador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 El Salvador 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Estonia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Eswatini 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Italy 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Liberia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Lithuania 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Montenegro 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Morocco 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Namibia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Netherlands 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Nicaragua 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Paraguay 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Peru 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Sao Tome and Principe 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Sierra Leone 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Taiwan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tajikistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Tunisia 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Türkiye 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uganda 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Ukraine 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 78 Uzbekistan 6 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Russian Federation
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 103,669 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 4,811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 8,299 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 14,209 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 4,811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 5,137 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 8,299 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.5499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 739.62 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Russian Federation was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 6 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- How does Russian Federation rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Russian Federation ranks 78th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.