How does Luxembourg rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?

Luxembourg ranks 126th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.

Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Luxembourg?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Luxembourg: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 43.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)

43.33

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

126th

of 188 countries

All-time high

43.33

in 2005

All-time low

43.33

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg, 2005–2013

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Luxembourg stood at 43.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Luxembourg peaked at 43.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 43.33, in 2005.

Luxembourg ranks 126th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	43.33	43.33	43.33	5
2010s	43.33	43.33	43.33	4

Countries ranked near Luxembourg

126 Belize 43.33 compare
126 Eswatini 43.33 compare
126 Hungary 43.33 compare
126 Iraq 43.33 compare
126 Philippines 43.33 compare
126 Qatar 43.33 compare
126 San Marino 43.33 compare
126 East Timor 43.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Luxembourg

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.041 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0209 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1381 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0065 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1381 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1376 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.099 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1147 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6709 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0353 (2050)

All data for Luxembourg →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Luxembourg?: Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Luxembourg was 43.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Luxembourg?: The highest recorded value was 43.33 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Luxembourg?: The lowest recorded value was 43.33 in 2005.
How does Luxembourg rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?: Luxembourg ranks 126th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Luxembourg?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Luxembourg data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.