Luxembourg vs Timor-Leste: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Luxembourg
43.33
in 2013
Timor-Leste
43.33
in 2013
Luxembourg rank
127th
Timor-Leste rank
127th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Luxembourg
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 127th and Timor-Leste ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Luxembourg or Timor-Leste?
- Luxembourg, at 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Luxembourg and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Luxembourg and Timor-Leste rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Luxembourg ranks 127th and Timor-Leste ranks 127th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.