Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Eswatini
Eswatini: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 43.33 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Eswatini, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Eswatini stood at 43.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 116.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Eswatini peaked at 43.33 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.
That places Eswatini 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | — |
| 2006 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 20 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 43.33 | +116.7% |
| 2011 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 43.33 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 46.67, 93% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 43.33 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 20 | 5 |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 43.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 128 Belize 43.33 compare
- 128 Hungary 43.33 compare
- 128 Iraq 43.33 compare
- 128 Luxembourg 43.33 compare
- 128 Philippines 43.33 compare
- 128 Qatar 43.33 compare
- 128 San Marino 43.33 compare
- 128 East Timor 43.33 compare
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Eswatini?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Eswatini was 43.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 43.33 in 2010.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
- How does Eswatini rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 116.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.