How does Liberia rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?

Liberia ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.

Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Liberia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Liberia

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Liberia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Liberia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 36.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)

36.67

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

144th

of 188 countries

All-time high

36.67

in 2005

All-time low

36.67

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Liberia, 2005–2013

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Liberia recorded 36.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Liberia peaked at 36.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 36.67, in 2005.

That places Liberia 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	36.67	36.67	36.67	5
2010s	36.67	36.67	36.67	4

Countries ranked near Liberia

144 Cameroon 36.67 compare
144 Egypt 36.67 compare
144 Equatorial Guinea 36.67 compare
144 Iran 36.67 compare
144 Mauritania 36.67 compare
144 Vietnam 36.67 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Liberia

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 319.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1597 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.016 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1282 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0476 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2896 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.183 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0532 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.2 (2050)

All data for Liberia →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Liberia?: Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Liberia was 36.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Liberia?: The highest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Liberia?: The lowest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
How does Liberia rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?: Liberia ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Liberia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Liberia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.