How does Cameroon rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?

Cameroon ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.

Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Cameroon?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Cameroon

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Cameroon
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Cameroon: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 36.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)

36.67

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

144th

of 188 countries

All-time high

36.67

in 2005

All-time low

36.67

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Cameroon, 2005–2013

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Cameroon recorded 36.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Cameroon peaked at 36.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 36.67, in 2005.

That places Cameroon 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	36.67	36.67	36.67	5
2010s	36.67	36.67	36.67	4

Countries ranked near Cameroon

144 Egypt 36.67 compare
144 Equatorial Guinea 36.67 compare
144 Iran 36.67 compare
144 Liberia 36.67 compare
144 Mauritania 36.67 compare
144 Vietnam 36.67 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Cameroon

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4076 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.49 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.199 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 4,583 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 836.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 16.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 5,729 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 362.18 (2050)

All data for Cameroon →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Cameroon?: Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Cameroon was 36.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Cameroon?: The highest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Cameroon?: The lowest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
How does Cameroon rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?: Cameroon ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Cameroon?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Cameroon data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.