Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 36.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea stood at 36.67. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 36.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 36.67, in 2005.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 36.67 | — |
| 2006 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 36.67 | +0.0% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 36.67 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 69% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 36.67 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 96% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.67 | 36.67 | 36.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 36.67 | 36.67 | 36.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 1.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0275 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 10.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 2.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 0.9434 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea was 36.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 36.67 in 2005.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.