Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel

Israel: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 80 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
80
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
9th
of 191 countries
All-time high
80
in 2005
All-time low
80
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel, 2005–2013

0204060802005200920132005: 802006: 802007: 802008: 802009: 802010: 802011: 802012: 802013: 80

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Israel stood at 80. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Israel peaked at 80 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 80, in 2005.

That places Israel 9th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 80 —
2006 80 +0.0%
2007 80 +0.0%
2008 80 +0.0%
2009 80 +0.0%
2010 80 +0.0%
2011 80 +0.0%
2012 80 +0.0%
2013 80 +0.0%

Israel compared with similar countries

  • Israel's 80 is above the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 1.4× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Israel's 80 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 46.67, 1.7× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 80 80 80 5
2010s 80 80 80 4

Countries ranked near Israel

  1. 7 Mauritius 83.33 compare
  2. 8 United States 82 compare
  3. 9 Colombia 80 compare
  4. 9 South Africa 80 compare
  5. 9 Thailand 80 compare
  6. 9 United Kingdom 80 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Israel

All data for Israel →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Israel?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Israel was 80 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Israel?
The highest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Israel?
The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
How does Israel rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Israel ranks 9th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Israel?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Israel data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/israel/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Israel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.