Israel vs South Africa: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Israel
80
in 2013
South Africa
80
in 2013
Israel rank
9th
South Africa rank
9th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- South Africa
How they compare
Israel currently reports 80 against 80 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 9th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Israel or South Africa?
- Israel, at 80 against 80 in South Africa as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Israel and South Africa?
- 0, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and South Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Israel and South Africa rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 9th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.