Israel vs Mauritius: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Israel
80
in 2013
Mauritius
83.33
in 2013
Israel rank
9th
Mauritius rank
7th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 83.33 against 80 in Israel, a difference of 3.33.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 9th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 190 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 83.33 | 3.33 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 80 | 83.33 | 3.33 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Israel or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 83.33 against 80 in Israel as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Israel and Mauritius?
- 3.33, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 9th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.