Belize vs Eswatini: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Belize
43.33
in 2013
Eswatini
43.33
in 2013
Belize rank
126th
Eswatini rank
126th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Belize
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belize currently reports 43.33 against 43.33 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 126th of 188 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 20 | 23.33 | Belize |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Belize or Eswatini?
- Belize, at 43.33 against 43.33 in Eswatini as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Belize and Eswatini?
- 0, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eswatini?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Belize and Eswatini rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Belize ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 126th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.