Centralization of Political Power Index in Norway
Norway: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.027 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Centralization of Political Power Index in Norway, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, centralization of political power index in Norway stood at 0.027.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 92.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Norway peaked at 0.603 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.014, in 2015.
Norway ranks 169th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Norway, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.603 | — |
| 1790 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.603 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.083 | -86.2% |
| 1816 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.077 | -7.2% |
| 1834 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.071 | -7.8% |
| 1871 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.068 | -4.2% |
| 1886 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.064 | -5.9% |
| 1906 | 0.06 | -6.3% |
| 1907 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.056 | -6.7% |
| 1921 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.056 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.379 | +576.8% |
| 1941 | 0.414 | +9.2% |
| 1942 | 0.578 | +39.6% |
| 1943 | 0.578 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.578 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.217 | -62.5% |
| 1946 | 0.029 | -86.6% |
| 1947 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.022 | -24.1% |
| 1951 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.019 | -13.6% |
| 1954 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.016 | -15.8% |
| 1965 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.017 | +6.3% |
| 2014 | 0.017 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.014 | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.018 | +28.6% |
| 2019 | 0.018 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.022 | +22.2% |
| 2021 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.028 | +27.3% |
| 2023 | 0.028 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.027 | -3.6% |
| 2025 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 0.027 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.09, 30% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Norway's 0.027 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1585, 17% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.603 | 0.603 | 0.603 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.603 | 0.603 | 0.603 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.603 | 0.603 | 0.603 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.3141 | 0.083 | 0.603 | 9 |
| 1820s | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.0788 | 0.077 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.0695 | 0.068 | 0.071 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.068 | 0.068 | 0.068 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.0644 | 0.06 | 0.068 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.286 | 0.029 | 0.578 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0199 | 0.019 | 0.022 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0172 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0257 | 0.022 | 0.028 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Norway
More reference data data for Norway
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3703 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3621 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7734 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3366 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Norway?
- Centralization of political power index in Norway was 0.027 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 0.603 in 1789.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.014 in 2015.
- How does Norway rank for centralization of political power index?
- Norway ranks 169th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is up 92.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.