Centralization of Political Power Index in Latvia
Latvia: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.044 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for centralization of political power index in Latvia is 0.044, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 10.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Latvia peaked at 0.976 in 1918 and was at its lowest, 0.039, in 2019.
Latvia ranks 161st of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.93 | — |
| 1790 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.881 | -5.3% |
| 1856 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.597 | -32.2% |
| 1865 | 0.508 | -14.9% |
| 1866 | 0.373 | -26.6% |
| 1867 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.77 | +106.4% |
| 1879 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.876 | +13.8% |
| 1882 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.852 | -2.7% |
| 1886 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.892 | +4.7% |
| 1901 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.884 | -0.9% |
| 1907 | 0.818 | -7.5% |
| 1908 | 0.807 | -1.3% |
| 1909 | 0.798 | -1.1% |
| 1910 | 0.805 | +0.9% |
| 1911 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.807 | +0.2% |
| 1915 | 0.809 | +0.2% |
| 1916 | 0.814 | +0.6% |
| 1917 | 0.802 | -1.5% |
| 1918 | 0.976 | +21.7% |
| 1919 | 0.969 | -0.7% |
| 1920 | 0.235 | -75.7% |
| 1921 | 0.235 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.215 | -8.5% |
| 1923 | 0.13 | -39.5% |
| 1924 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.3 | +130.8% |
| 1935 | 0.459 | +53.0% |
| 1936 | 0.484 | +5.4% |
| 1937 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.971 | +100.6% |
| 1941 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.964 | -0.7% |
| 1955 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.963 | -0.1% |
| 1981 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.96 | -0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.943 | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 0.942 | -0.1% |
| 1989 | 0.922 | -2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.24 | -74.0% |
| 1991 | 0.129 | -46.2% |
| 1992 | 0.129 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.125 | -3.1% |
| 1994 | 0.117 | -6.4% |
| 1995 | 0.119 | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 0.084 | -29.4% |
| 1997 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.083 | -1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.075 | -9.6% |
| 2003 | 0.075 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.075 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.079 | +5.3% |
| 2006 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.08 | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 0.071 | -11.3% |
| 2009 | 0.063 | -11.3% |
| 2010 | 0.066 | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.066 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.063 | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.045 | -28.6% |
| 2014 | 0.049 | +8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.047 | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.042 | -10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.039 | -7.1% |
| 2020 | 0.041 | +5.1% |
| 2021 | 0.04 | -2.4% |
| 2022 | 0.041 | +2.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05 | +22.0% |
| 2024 | 0.044 | -12.0% |
| 2025 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.044 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.09, 49% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.044 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1585, 28% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.9055 | 0.881 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.6121 | 0.373 | 0.881 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.4524 | 0.373 | 0.77 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.8534 | 0.77 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.852 | 0.852 | 0.852 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.8659 | 0.798 | 0.892 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.8397 | 0.802 | 0.976 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.1595 | 0.13 | 0.235 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3215 | 0.13 | 0.484 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.971 | 0.971 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.9668 | 0.964 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9545 | 0.922 | 0.963 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1195 | 0.084 | 0.24 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0763 | 0.063 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0513 | 0.039 | 0.066 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0433 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 159 Iceland 0.045 compare
- 159 Seychelles 0.045 compare
- 162 Ireland 0.039 compare
- 163 Czechia 0.036 compare
- 163 Netherlands 0.036 compare
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Latvia?
- Centralization of political power index in Latvia was 0.044 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.976 in 1918.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.039 in 2019.
- How does Latvia rank for centralization of political power index?
- Latvia ranks 161st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.