Political centralization index in Latvia
Latvia: Political centralization index was 0.044 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Latest (2025)
0.044
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.976
in 1918
All-time low
0.039
in 2019
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Political centralization index in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for political centralization index in Latvia is 0.044, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 10.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political centralization index in Latvia peaked at 0.976 in 1918 and was at its lowest, 0.039, in 2019.
Latvia ranks 161st of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Political centralization index in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.93 | — |
| 1790 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.881 | -5.3% |
| 1856 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.881 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.597 | -32.2% |
| 1865 | 0.508 | -14.9% |
| 1866 | 0.373 | -26.6% |
| 1867 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.373 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.77 | +106.4% |
| 1879 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.876 | +13.8% |
| 1882 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.852 | -2.7% |
| 1886 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.852 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.892 | +4.7% |
| 1901 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.892 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.884 | -0.9% |
| 1907 | 0.818 | -7.5% |
| 1908 | 0.807 | -1.3% |
| 1909 | 0.798 | -1.1% |
| 1910 | 0.805 | +0.9% |
| 1911 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.807 | +0.2% |
| 1915 | 0.809 | +0.2% |
| 1916 | 0.814 | +0.6% |
| 1917 | 0.802 | -1.5% |
| 1918 | 0.976 | +21.7% |
| 1919 | 0.969 | -0.7% |
| 1920 | 0.235 | -75.7% |
| 1921 | 0.235 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.215 | -8.5% |
| 1923 | 0.13 | -39.5% |
| 1924 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.13 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.3 | +130.8% |
| 1935 | 0.459 | +53.0% |
| 1936 | 0.484 | +5.4% |
| 1937 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.484 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.971 | +100.6% |
| 1941 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.964 | -0.7% |
| 1955 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.963 | -0.1% |
| 1981 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.96 | -0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.943 | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 0.942 | -0.1% |
| 1989 | 0.922 | -2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.24 | -74.0% |
| 1991 | 0.129 | -46.2% |
| 1992 | 0.129 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.125 | -3.1% |
| 1994 | 0.117 | -6.4% |
| 1995 | 0.119 | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 0.084 | -29.4% |
| 1997 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.083 | -1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.075 | -9.6% |
| 2003 | 0.075 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.075 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.079 | +5.3% |
| 2006 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.08 | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 0.071 | -11.3% |
| 2009 | 0.063 | -11.3% |
| 2010 | 0.066 | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.066 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.063 | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.045 | -28.6% |
| 2014 | 0.049 | +8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.047 | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.042 | -10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.039 | -7.1% |
| 2020 | 0.041 | +5.1% |
| 2021 | 0.04 | -2.4% |
| 2022 | 0.041 | +2.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05 | +22.0% |
| 2024 | 0.044 | -12.0% |
| 2025 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.044 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.09, 49% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.044 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1585, 28% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.9055 | 0.881 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.6121 | 0.373 | 0.881 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.4524 | 0.373 | 0.77 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.8534 | 0.77 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.852 | 0.852 | 0.852 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.8659 | 0.798 | 0.892 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.8397 | 0.802 | 0.976 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.1595 | 0.13 | 0.235 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3215 | 0.13 | 0.484 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.971 | 0.971 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.9668 | 0.964 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9545 | 0.922 | 0.963 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1195 | 0.084 | 0.24 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0763 | 0.063 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0513 | 0.039 | 0.066 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0433 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 159 Iceland 0.045 compare
- 159 Seychelles 0.045 compare
- 162 Ireland 0.039 compare
- 163 Czechia 0.036 compare
- 163 Netherlands 0.036 compare
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political centralization index in Latvia?
- Political centralization index in Latvia was 0.044 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest political centralization index recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.976 in 1918.
- What is the lowest political centralization index recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.039 in 2019.
- How does Latvia rank for political centralization index?
- Latvia ranks 161st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political centralization index rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Political centralization index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).