PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 3 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 480 but lower than or equal to 553 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 3 can represent the literal meaning of single or multiple texts in the absence of explicit content or organizational clues. Readers can integrate content and generate both...

Countries reporting
55
Highest
26.7%
Liechtenstein
Lowest
4.0%
Tunisia
Median
14.0%
Years covered
19
2000–2018
Data points
356

What the numbers show

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 3 is currently reported for 55 countries. The highest value is 26.7% in Liechtenstein; the lowest is 4.0% in Tunisia.

The median across all reporting countries is 14.0%, and the mean is 13.0%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 7.

Over the past decade 5 countries rose and 42 fell. The largest increase was in Qatar (up 42.9%), and the largest decrease in Tunisia (down 50.0%).

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 3: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Liechtenstein 26.7% 2012 down 12.3% falling
2 Spain 17.0% 2015 unchanged flat
3 Croatia 16.0% 2018 down 5.9% falling
3 Latvia 16.0% 2018 down 15.8% rising
3 Japan 16.0% 2018 up 14.3% flat
3 Ireland 16.0% 2018 unchanged rising
3 Denmark 16.0% 2018 down 5.9% flat
3 Slovenia 16.0% 2018 unchanged falling
9 Macao 15.0% 2018 down 21.1% falling
9 Lithuania 15.0% 2018 down 11.8% falling
9 Estonia 15.0% 2018 down 11.8% falling
9 Portugal 15.0% 2018 down 16.7% falling
9 Turkey 15.0% 2018 down 6.2% rising
9 Russia 15.0% 2018 down 6.2% flat
9 Poland 15.0% 2018 down 11.8% flat
16 Hong Kong 14.0% 2018 unchanged falling
16 Austria 14.0% 2018 down 6.7% flat
16 South Korea 14.0% 2018 down 6.7% falling
16 Belgium 14.0% 2018 up 7.7% rising
16 Italy 14.0% 2018 down 12.5% falling
16 Iceland 14.0% 2018 down 17.6% falling
16 Hungary 14.0% 2018 down 12.5% falling
16 Greece 14.0% 2018 down 17.6% flat
16 United Kingdom 14.0% 2018 down 12.5% flat
16 France 14.0% 2018 down 6.7% falling
16 Finland 14.0% 2018 unchanged flat
16 Canada 14.0% 2018 down 6.7% flat
16 Norway 14.0% 2018 down 12.5% flat
16 Czechia 14.0% 2018 unchanged falling
30 Australia 13.0% 2018 down 13.3% flat
30 Switzerland 13.0% 2018 down 13.3% falling
30 Netherlands 13.0% 2018 down 7.1% falling
30 New Zealand 13.0% 2018 unchanged flat
30 Jordan 13.0% 2018 up 18.2% rising
30 Israel 13.0% 2018 down 13.3% falling
30 Sweden 13.0% 2018 down 18.8% falling
30 Slovakia 13.0% 2018 down 23.5% falling
30 Chile 13.0% 2018 down 7.1% rising
39 Romania 12.0% 2018 down 7.7% flat
39 United States 12.0% 2018 down 14.3% falling
39 Uruguay 12.0% 2018 down 7.7% rising
39 Luxembourg 12.0% 2018 down 14.3% falling
39 Germany 12.0% 2018 down 14.3% flat
44 Montenegro 10.0% 2018 down 9.1% rising
44 Mexico 10.0% 2018 down 16.7% rising
44 Qatar 10.0% 2018 up 42.9% rising
44 Bulgaria 10.0% 2018 down 23.1% falling
48 Brazil 9.0% 2018 down 10.0% flat
48 Argentina 9.0% 2018 down 10.0% falling
48 Albania 9.0% 2018 unchanged rising
51 Colombia 8.0% 2018 down 20.0% flat
51 Thailand 8.0% 2018 down 33.3% falling
53 Peru 7.0% 2018 up 16.7% rising
54 Indonesia 5.0% 2018 down 37.5% rising
55 Tunisia 4.0% 2015 down 50.0% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 3
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 356 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 480 but lower than or equal to 553 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 3 can represent the literal meaning of single or multiple texts in the absence of explicit content or organizational clues. Readers can integrate content and generate both basic and more advanced inferences. They can also integrate several parts of a piece of text in order to identify the main idea, understand a relationship or construe the meaning of a word or phrase when the required information is featured on a single page. They can search for information based on indirect prompts, and locate target information that is not in a prominent position and/or is in the presence of distractors. In some cases, readers at this level recognize the relationship between several pieces of information based on multiple criteria. Level 3 readers can reflect on a piece of text or a small set of texts, and compare and contrast several authors’ viewpoints based on explicit information. Reflective tasks at this level may require the reader to perform comparisons, generate explanations or evaluate a feature of the text. Some reflective tasks require readers to demonstrate a detailed understanding of a piece of text dealing with a familiar topic, whereas others require a basic understanding of less-familiar content. Tasks at Level 3 require the reader to take many features into account when comparing, contrasting or categorizing information. The required information is often not prominent or there may be a considerable amount of competing information. Texts typical of this level may include other obstacles, such as ideas that are contrary to expectation or negatively worded. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 3 data have been included in this database as Level 3 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/