PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is...

Countries reporting
52
Highest
34.0%
Jordan
Lowest
18.0%
Hong Kong
Median
24.0%
Years covered
19
2000–2018
Data points
349

What the numbers show

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 is currently reported for 52 countries. The highest value is 34.0% in Jordan; the lowest is 18.0% in Hong Kong.

The median across all reporting countries is 24.0%, and the mean is 24.4%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 2.

Over the past decade 20 countries rose and 29 fell. The largest increase was in South Korea (up 33.3%), and the largest decrease in Macao (down 38.7%).

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Jordan 34.0% 2018 up 6.2% rising
2 Mexico 32.0% 2018 down 3.0% rising
3 Albania 30.0% 2018 up 15.4% rising
3 Turkey 30.0% 2018 down 6.2% flat
3 Montenegro 30.0% 2018 up 7.1% rising
6 Chile 29.0% 2018 down 12.1% flat
7 Russia 28.0% 2018 down 12.5% falling
7 Romania 28.0% 2018 down 12.5% rising
7 Colombia 28.0% 2018 down 9.7% rising
7 Uruguay 28.0% 2018 unchanged rising
7 Croatia 28.0% 2018 up 3.7% flat
12 Slovakia 27.0% 2018 down 3.6% flat
12 Latvia 27.0% 2018 down 6.9% flat
12 Greece 27.0% 2018 up 3.8% flat
15 Peru 26.0% 2018 up 18.2% rising
15 Argentina 26.0% 2018 up 4.0% rising
15 Thailand 26.0% 2018 down 29.7% falling
15 Lithuania 26.0% 2018 down 13.3% falling
15 Italy 26.0% 2018 up 8.3% flat
20 Hungary 25.0% 2018 up 4.2% falling
20 Brazil 25.0% 2018 down 7.4% flat
20 Bulgaria 25.0% 2018 up 8.7% falling
20 Iceland 25.0% 2018 up 13.6% rising
20 Czechia 25.0% 2018 down 7.4% flat
20 Slovenia 25.0% 2018 down 3.8% flat
26 Netherlands 24.0% 2018 down 4.0% flat
26 Denmark 24.0% 2018 down 7.7% flat
26 Spain 24.0% 2015 down 20.0% falling
30 Qatar 23.0% 2018 up 27.8% rising
30 Portugal 23.0% 2018 down 11.5% falling
30 Switzerland 23.0% 2018 unchanged flat
30 Austria 23.0% 2018 down 4.2% flat
30 France 23.0% 2018 up 9.5% falling
30 United Kingdom 23.0% 2018 down 8.0% rising
37 Belgium 22.0% 2018 up 10.0% rising
37 Japan 22.0% 2018 up 22.2% rising
37 Indonesia 22.0% 2018 down 35.3% flat
37 Poland 22.0% 2018 down 8.3% falling
42 Sweden 21.0% 2018 down 8.7% rising
42 Tunisia 21.0% 2015 down 19.2% flat
42 Australia 21.0% 2018 up 5.0% rising
42 United States 21.0% 2018 down 12.5% flat
42 New Zealand 21.0% 2018 up 10.5% rising
42 Norway 21.0% 2018 down 12.5% flat
42 Germany 21.0% 2018 down 4.5% flat
42 Estonia 21.0% 2018 down 19.2% falling
50 Canada 20.0% 2018 unchanged rising
50 South Korea 20.0% 2018 up 33.3% rising
52 Macao 19.0% 2018 down 38.7% falling
52 Finland 19.0% 2018 up 11.8% rising
52 Israel 19.0% 2018 down 13.6% falling
55 Hong Kong 18.0% 2018 up 12.5% flat

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 349 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/