PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Latvia
Latvia: PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 was 27.0% in 2018. ▬ Flat
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Latvia, 2000–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
The most recent figure for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Latvia is 27.0%, measured in 2018.
The figure is down 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Latvia peaked at 29.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 26.0%, in 2000.
Latvia ranks 12th of 55 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.2% | 26.0% | 29.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 27.0% | 27.0% | 27.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Spring temperature anomalies 4.57 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.58 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -5.99 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 2.33 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 3.08 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 162.39 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Latvia?
- Pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Latvia was 27.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 29.0% in 2009.
- What is the lowest pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.0% in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Latvia ranks 12th out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/