Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in China
China: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score was 93.33 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in China, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in China is 93.33, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in China peaked at 93.33 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 43.33, in 2005.
China ranks 16th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in China, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 43.33 | — |
| 2006 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 86.67 | +100.0% |
| 2009 | 90 | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 93.33 | +3.7% |
| 2019 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 93.33 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 80, 1.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- China's 93.33 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 74.17, 1.3× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.33 | 43.33 | 90 | 5 |
| 2010s | 90.67 | 90 | 93.33 | 10 |
Countries ranked near China
- 16 Belarus 93.33 compare
- 16 Chile 93.33 compare
- 16 Dominican Republic 93.33 compare
- 16 El Salvador 93.33 compare
- 16 Latvia 93.33 compare
- 16 New Zealand 93.33 compare
- 16 North Macedonia 93.33 compare
- 16 Poland 93.33 compare
- 16 South Africa 93.33 compare
- 16 Tajikistan 93.33 compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in China?
- Paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in China was 93.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 93.33 in 2018.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.33 in 2005.
- How does China rank for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- China ranks 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.