Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Chile
Chile: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score was 93.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Chile, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Chile is 93.33, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Chile peaked at 93.33 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 91.67, in 2005.
Chile ranks 16th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 91.67 | — |
| 2006 | 91.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 91.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 91.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 91.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 93.33 | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 93.33 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 93.33 is above the median for high income countries, which is 88.33, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Chile's 93.33 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 58.33, 1.6× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.67 | 91.67 | 91.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 93.33 | 93.33 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 16 China 93.33 compare
- 16 Belarus 93.33 compare
- 16 Dominican Republic 93.33 compare
- 16 El Salvador 93.33 compare
- 16 Latvia 93.33 compare
- 16 New Zealand 93.33 compare
- 16 North Macedonia 93.33 compare
- 16 Poland 93.33 compare
- 16 South Africa 93.33 compare
- 16 Tajikistan 93.33 compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Chile?
- Paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Chile was 93.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 93.33 in 2010.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 91.67 in 2005.
- How does Chile rank for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Chile ranks 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.