China (People’s Republic of) vs Latvia: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
93.33
in 2019
Latvia
93.33
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
16th
Latvia rank
16th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Latvia
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 93.33 against 93.33 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 190 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.33 | 86 | 24.67 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 90.67 | 93.33 | 2.67 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Latvia?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 93.33 against 93.33 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia?
- 0, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.