Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau
Tokelau: Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas was 0.0% in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau, 2000–2024
Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.
Analysis
Tokelau recorded 0.0% for open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 25 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau peaked at 8.8% in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2019.
That places Tokelau 105th out of 175 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 8.8% | — |
| 2001 | 8.4% | -4.8% |
| 2002 | 8.0% | -5.0% |
| 2003 | 7.5% | -5.3% |
| 2004 | 7.1% | -5.6% |
| 2005 | 6.7% | -5.9% |
| 2006 | 6.3% | -6.3% |
| 2007 | 5.9% | -6.7% |
| 2008 | 5.4% | -7.2% |
| 2009 | 5.0% | -7.8% |
| 2010 | 4.6% | -8.5% |
| 2011 | 4.2% | -9.2% |
| 2012 | 3.7% | -10.2% |
| 2013 | 3.3% | -11.3% |
| 2014 | 2.9% | -12.8% |
| 2015 | 2.5% | -14.7% |
| 2016 | 2.0% | -17.2% |
| 2017 | 1.6% | -20.7% |
| 2018 | 1.2% | -26.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0% | — |
| 2021 | 0.0% | — |
| 2022 | 0.0% | — |
| 2023 | 0.0% | — |
| 2024 | 0.0% | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -100.0% | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 5.0% | 8.8% | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 0.0% | 4.6% | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tokelau
- 102 Azerbaijan 0.1% compare
- 103 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 104 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 105 Albania 0.0% compare
- 105 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 105 Andorra 0.0%
- 105 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0% compare
- 105 Austria 0.0%
- 105 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 105 Belarus 0.0%
- 105 Belgium 0.0%
- 105 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 105 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0% compare
- 105 Brazil 0.0% compare
- 105 Bulgaria 0.0%
- 105 Canada 0.0%
- 105 Chile 0.0% compare
- 105 China 0.0% compare
- 105 Cyprus 0.0%
- 105 Czechia 0.0%
- 105 Denmark 0.0%
- 105 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 105 Estonia 0.0%
- 105 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 105 Falkland Islands 0.0%
- 105 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 105 Finland 0.0%
- 105 France 0.0%
- 105 Gambia 0.0% compare
- 105 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 105 Germany 0.0%
- 105 Greece 0.0% compare
- 105 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 105 Hungary 0.0%
- 105 Iceland 0.0%
- 105 Iraq 0.0% compare
- 105 Ireland 0.0%
- 105 Israel 0.0%
- 105 Italy 0.0%
- 105 Kazakhstan 0.0% compare
- 105 Kyrgyzstan 0.0% compare
- 105 Latvia 0.0%
- 105 Lithuania 0.0%
- 105 Luxembourg 0.0%
- 105 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 105 Malta 0.0%
- 105 Mexico 0.0% compare
- 105 Morocco 0.0% compare
- 105 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 105 Netherlands 0.0%
- 105 New Zealand 0.0%
- 105 North Korea 0.0%
- 105 Norway 0.0%
- 105 Oman 0.0% compare
- 105 Palau 0.0%
- 105 Poland 0.0%
- 105 Portugal 0.0%
- 105 Romania 0.0%
- 105 Russia 0.0%
- 105 Slovakia 0.0%
- 105 South Africa 0.0% compare
- 105 Spain 0.0%
- 105 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 105 Sweden 0.0%
- 105 Switzerland 0.0%
- 105 Thailand 0.0% compare
- 105 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 105 Turkmenistan 0.0% compare
- 105 United Arab Emirates 0.0%
- 105 United Kingdom 0.0%
- 105 United States 0.0%
- 105 Uruguay 0.0% compare
- 105 Vietnam 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Tokelau
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 1 events (2005)
- Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth -10.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign aid received by income group, annual growth rate -10.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled 0 Cases (2019)
- Foreign aid received, annual growth rate -10.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign aid received from governments and private foundations, annual -10.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Share of adults who are obese 70.0% (2024)
- Share of men who are obese 66.7% (2024)
- Share of men who are overweight or obese 88.5% (2024)
- Foreign aid received 13.97 million constant 2024 US$ (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau?
- Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in Tokelau was 0.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas recorded in Tokelau?
- The highest recorded value was 8.8% in 2000.
- What is the lowest open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas recorded in Tokelau?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2019.
- How does Tokelau rank for open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas?
- Tokelau ranks 105th out of 175 countries with data for 2024.
- Is open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas rising or falling in Tokelau?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tokelau data come from?
- The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Share of people who practice open defecation. This includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.