Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China
China: Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas was 0.0% in 2024. β Volatile
Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China, 2000β2024
Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2024, open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 25 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China peaked at 3.9% in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2022.
That places China 105th out of 175 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2% | 2.4% | 3.9% | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.5% | 2.2% | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
- 102 Azerbaijan 0.1% compare
- 103 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 104 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 105 Albania 0.0% compare
- 105 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 105 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 105 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0% compare
- 105 Austria 0.0% compare
- 105 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 105 Belarus 0.0% compare
- 105 Belgium 0.0% compare
- 105 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 105 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0% compare
- 105 Brazil 0.0% compare
- 105 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 105 Canada 0.0% compare
- 105 Chile 0.0% compare
- 105 Cyprus 0.0% compare
- 105 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 105 Denmark 0.0% compare
- 105 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 105 Estonia 0.0% compare
- 105 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 105 Falkland Islands 0.0% compare
- 105 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 105 Finland 0.0% compare
- 105 France 0.0% compare
- 105 Gambia 0.0% compare
- 105 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 105 Germany 0.0% compare
- 105 Greece 0.0% compare
- 105 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 105 Hungary 0.0% compare
- 105 Iceland 0.0% compare
- 105 Iraq 0.0% compare
- 105 Ireland 0.0% compare
- 105 Israel 0.0% compare
- 105 Italy 0.0% compare
- 105 Kazakhstan 0.0% compare
- 105 Kyrgyzstan 0.0% compare
- 105 Latvia 0.0% compare
- 105 Lithuania 0.0% compare
- 105 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 105 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 105 Malta 0.0% compare
- 105 Mexico 0.0% compare
- 105 Morocco 0.0% compare
- 105 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 105 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 105 New Zealand 0.0% compare
- 105 North Korea 0.0% compare
- 105 Norway 0.0% compare
- 105 Oman 0.0% compare
- 105 Palau 0.0% compare
- 105 Poland 0.0% compare
- 105 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 105 Romania 0.0% compare
- 105 Russia 0.0% compare
- 105 Slovakia 0.0% compare
- 105 South Africa 0.0% compare
- 105 Spain 0.0% compare
- 105 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 105 Sweden 0.0% compare
- 105 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 105 Thailand 0.0% compare
- 105 Tokelau 0.0% compare
- 105 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 105 Turkmenistan 0.0% compare
- 105 United Arab Emirates 0.0% compare
- 105 United Kingdom 0.0% compare
- 105 United States 0.0% compare
- 105 Uruguay 0.0% compare
- 105 Vietnam 0.0% compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 966.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 27,128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 275.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 5,377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 966.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 336,373 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 116.22 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China?
- Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas in China was 0.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 3.9% in 2000.
- What is the lowest open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2022.
- How does China rank for open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas?
- China ranks 105th out of 175 countries with data for 2024.
- Is open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Open defecation in rural areas vs. urban areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Share of people who practice open defecation. This includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.