Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador
Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total was 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ in 2020. ▼ Falling
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador, 1995–2020
Source: World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Measured in real chained 2019 US$.
Analysis
In 2020, nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador stood at 2,862 real chained 2019 US$. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
The figure is down 1.8% on the previous year and down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador peaked at 10,980 real chained 2019 US$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 2,862 real chained 2019 US$, in 2020.
That places Ecuador 34th out of 151 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | real chained 2019 US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 6,631 real chained 2019 US$ | — |
| 1996 | 6,632 real chained 2019 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 6,920 real chained 2019 US$ | +4.3% |
| 1998 | 7,583 real chained 2019 US$ | +9.6% |
| 1999 | 8,040 real chained 2019 US$ | +6.0% |
| 2000 | 8,149 real chained 2019 US$ | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 10,262 real chained 2019 US$ | +25.9% |
| 2002 | 10,980 real chained 2019 US$ | +7.0% |
| 2003 | 10,767 real chained 2019 US$ | -1.9% |
| 2004 | 10,381 real chained 2019 US$ | -3.6% |
| 2005 | 7,384 real chained 2019 US$ | -28.9% |
| 2006 | 6,727 real chained 2019 US$ | -8.9% |
| 2007 | 6,786 real chained 2019 US$ | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 6,642 real chained 2019 US$ | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 6,952 real chained 2019 US$ | +4.7% |
| 2010 | 5,336 real chained 2019 US$ | -23.2% |
| 2011 | 5,101 real chained 2019 US$ | -4.4% |
| 2012 | 4,855 real chained 2019 US$ | -4.8% |
| 2013 | 5,055 real chained 2019 US$ | +4.1% |
| 2014 | 4,296 real chained 2019 US$ | -15.0% |
| 2015 | 4,310 real chained 2019 US$ | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 4,012 real chained 2019 US$ | -6.9% |
| 2017 | 3,786 real chained 2019 US$ | -5.6% |
| 2018 | 2,977 real chained 2019 US$ | -21.4% |
| 2019 | 2,915 real chained 2019 US$ | -2.1% |
| 2020 | 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ | -1.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1,150 real chained 2019 US$, 2.5× the median. (43 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 934.75 real chained 2019 US$, 3.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,161 real chained 2019 US$ | 6,631 real chained 2019 US$ | 8,040 real chained 2019 US$ | 5 |
| 2000s | 8,503 real chained 2019 US$ | 6,642 real chained 2019 US$ | 10,980 real chained 2019 US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,264 real chained 2019 US$ | 2,915 real chained 2019 US$ | 5,336 real chained 2019 US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ | 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ | 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador?
- Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total in Ecuador was 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ in 2020, according to World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4.
- What is the highest nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 10,980 real chained 2019 US$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Ecuador ranks 34th out of 151 countries with data for 2020.
- Is nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as part of Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.