Ecuador vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Ecuador
2,862 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand
2,386 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
34th
New Zealand rank
37th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,386 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 476 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 37th of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 7,161 real chained 2019 US$ 4,187 real chained 2019 US$ 2,975 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 8,503 real chained 2019 US$ 2,929 real chained 2019 US$ 5,574 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 4,264 real chained 2019 US$ 2,548 real chained 2019 US$ 1,716 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ 2,386 real chained 2019 US$ 476.17 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Ecuador or New Zealand?
Ecuador, at 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,386 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Ecuador and New Zealand?
476 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Ecuador ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 37th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.