Ecuador vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Ecuador
2,862 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
3,186 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
34th
South Africa rank
32nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 3,186 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 324 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 151 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 7,161 real chained 2019 US$ 21,467 real chained 2019 US$ 14,305 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 8,503 real chained 2019 US$ 14,351 real chained 2019 US$ 5,848 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 4,264 real chained 2019 US$ 6,659 real chained 2019 US$ 2,395 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ 3,186 real chained 2019 US$ 324.5 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 3,186 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,862 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Ecuador and South Africa?
324 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Ecuador ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.