Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay
Uruguay: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure was 17.4% in 2004. ▼ Falling
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay, 1999–2004
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2004, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay stood at 17.4%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 42.6% on the previous year and up 36.0% over ten years.
That places Uruguay 15th out of 65 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the top quarter.
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 12.8% | — |
| 2000 | 23.3% | +81.9% |
| 2001 | 12.7% | -45.5% |
| 2002 | 12.2% | -3.8% |
| 2003 | 12.2% | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 17.4% | +42.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.8% | 12.8% | 12.8% | 1 |
| 2000s | 15.6% | 12.2% | 23.3% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay?
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Uruguay was 17.4% in 2004, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 23.3% in 2000.
- What is the lowest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.2% in 2002.
- How does Uruguay rank for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Uruguay ranks 15th out of 65 countries with data for 2004.
- Is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/