Italy vs Uruguay: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Italy
- Uruguay
How they compare
Italy currently reports 17.5% against 17.4% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.
Italy ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 65 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Italy or Uruguay?
- Italy, at 17.5% against 17.4% in Uruguay as of 2015.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Italy and Uruguay?
- 0.1%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Italy and Uruguay rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Italy ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 65 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/