Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia
Serbia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate was -100 % change on previous year in 2014. ◆ Volatile
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia, 2002–2014
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2014, meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia stood at -100 % change on previous year. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Over the whole period, meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia peaked at 0 % change on previous year in 2002 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 2014.
That places Serbia 82nd out of 111 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2006 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2009 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2012 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2014 | -100 % change on previous year | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2010s | -20 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 82 Albania -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Benin -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Burkina Faso -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Bangladesh -100 % change on previous year
- 82 Bosnia and Herzegovina -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Georgia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Guinea-Bissau -100 % change on previous year
- 82 Guyana -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Hungary -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Indonesia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 India -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Madagascar -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Mexico -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Mali -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Mongolia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Mauritius -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Niger -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Nigeria -100 % change on previous year
- 82 Nicaragua -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Philippines -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Papua New Guinea -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Sierra Leone -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 El Salvador -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Thailand -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Tunisia -100 % change on previous year
- 82 Turkey -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Ukraine -100 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Venezuela -100 % change on previous year
- 82 Zambia -100 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia?
- Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Serbia was -100 % change on previous year in 2014, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 % change on previous year in 2002.
- What is the lowest meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 2014.
- How does Serbia rank for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
- Serbia ranks 82nd out of 111 countries with data for 2014.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Meaningful democratic electoral institutions V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.