Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines

Philippines: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate was -100 % change on previous year in 2016. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2016)
-100 % change on previous year
World rank
82nd
of 111 countries
All-time high
0 % change on previous year
in 1989
All-time low
-100 % change on previous year
in 2004
Years of data
22
1989–2016

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines, 1989–2016

-100-80-60-40-2001989200220161989: 0 % change on previous year1990: 0 % change on previous year1991: 0 % change on previous year1992: 0 % change on previous year1993: 0 % change on previous year1994: 0 % change on previous year1995: 0 % change on previous year1996: 0 % change on previous year1997: 0 % change on previous year1998: 0 % change on previous year1999: 0 % change on previous year2000: 0 % change on previous year2001: 0 % change on previous year2002: 0 % change on previous year2003: 0 % change on previous year2004: -100 % change on previous year2011: 0 % change on previous year2012: 0 % change on previous year2013: 0 % change on previous year2014: 0 % change on previous year2015: 0 % change on previous year2016: -100 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Philippines recorded -100 % change on previous year for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in 2016. That is the lowest value across all 22 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines peaked at 0 % change on previous year in 1989 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 2004.

That places Philippines 82nd out of 111 countries with data for 2016, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines, year by year

Annual values for Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines, 1989 to 2016.
Year % change on previous year Change
1989 0 % change on previous year
1990 0 % change on previous year
1991 0 % change on previous year
1992 0 % change on previous year
1993 0 % change on previous year
1994 0 % change on previous year
1995 0 % change on previous year
1996 0 % change on previous year
1997 0 % change on previous year
1998 0 % change on previous year
1999 0 % change on previous year
2000 0 % change on previous year
2001 0 % change on previous year
2002 0 % change on previous year
2003 0 % change on previous year
2004 -100 % change on previous year
2011 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2012 0 % change on previous year
2013 0 % change on previous year
2014 0 % change on previous year
2015 0 % change on previous year
2016 -100 % change on previous year

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 10
2000s -20 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 5
2010s -16.67 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 6

Countries ranked near Philippines

  1. 82 Albania -100 % change on previous year compare
  2. 82 Benin -100 % change on previous year compare
  3. 82 Burkina Faso -100 % change on previous year compare
  4. 82 Bangladesh -100 % change on previous year compare
  5. 82 Bosnia and Herzegovina -100 % change on previous year compare
  6. 82 Georgia -100 % change on previous year compare
  7. 82 Guinea-Bissau -100 % change on previous year
  8. 82 Guyana -100 % change on previous year compare
  9. 82 Hungary -100 % change on previous year compare
  10. 82 Indonesia -100 % change on previous year compare
  11. 82 India -100 % change on previous year compare
  12. 82 Madagascar -100 % change on previous year compare
  13. 82 Mexico -100 % change on previous year compare
  14. 82 Mali -100 % change on previous year compare
  15. 82 Mongolia -100 % change on previous year compare
  16. 82 Mauritius -100 % change on previous year compare
  17. 82 Niger -100 % change on previous year compare
  18. 82 Nigeria -100 % change on previous year
  19. 82 Nicaragua -100 % change on previous year compare
  20. 82 Papua New Guinea -100 % change on previous year compare
  21. 82 Sierra Leone -100 % change on previous year compare
  22. 82 El Salvador -100 % change on previous year compare
  23. 82 Serbia -100 % change on previous year compare
  24. 82 Thailand -100 % change on previous year compare
  25. 82 Tunisia -100 % change on previous year
  26. 82 Turkey -100 % change on previous year compare
  27. 82 Ukraine -100 % change on previous year compare
  28. 82 Venezuela -100 % change on previous year compare
  29. 82 Zambia -100 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 111 places →

More reference data data for Philippines

All data for Philippines →

Frequently asked questions

What is meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines?
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines was -100 % change on previous year in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate recorded in Philippines?
The highest recorded value was 0 % change on previous year in 1989.
What is the lowest meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate recorded in Philippines?
The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 2004.
How does Philippines rank for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
Philippines ranks 82nd out of 111 countries with data for 2016.
Is meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate rising or falling in Philippines?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Philippines data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/meaningful-democratic-electoral-institutions-annual-growth-rate/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/meaningful-democratic-electoral-institutions-annual-growth-rate/philippines/">Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate in Philippines</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,240 data points, 1850–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.