Nicaragua vs Serbia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate
Nicaragua
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Serbia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Nicaragua rank
82nd
Serbia rank
82nd
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 82nd and Serbia ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Nicaragua, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2007.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
- Nicaragua ranks 82nd and Serbia ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.