Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique
Mozambique: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
0.0%
World rank
68th
of 174 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 2006
All-time low
0.0%
in 2006
Years of data
14
2006–2019
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique, 2006–2019
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique is 0.0%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique peaked at 0.0% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2006.
Mozambique ranks 68th of 174 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 65 Panama 1.4% compare
- 66 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 67 Türkiye 0.3% compare
- 68 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 68 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 68 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 68 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 68 Belize 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0% compare
- 68 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 68 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 68 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 68 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 68 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 68 Cabo Verde 0.0% compare
- 68 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 68 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 China (People’s Republic of) 0.0% compare
- 68 Colombia 0.0%
- 68 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Côte d’Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 68 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 68 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 68 France 0.0% compare
- 68 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0% compare
- 68 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 68 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 68 Hong Kong (China) 0.0% compare
- 68 India 0.0% compare
- 68 Iran 0.0% compare
- 68 Italy 0.0% compare
- 68 Japan 0.0% compare
- 68 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 68 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 68 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 68 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 68 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 68 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 68 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 68 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 68 Macau (China) 0.0% compare
- 68 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 68 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 68 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 68 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 68 Mali 0.0% compare
- 68 Malta 0.0% compare
- 68 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 68 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 68 Nauru 0.0% compare
- 68 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 68 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 68 Niger 0.0% compare
- 68 Oman 0.0% compare
- 68 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Palau 0.0% compare
- 68 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 68 Poland 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 68 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 68 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 68 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 68 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 68 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 68 Slovak Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 68 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 68 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 68 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 68 Syria 0.0% compare
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 Timor-Leste 0.0% compare
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 68 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 68 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 68 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 68 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 68 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 68 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Mozambique
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.53 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Mozambique was 0.0% in 2019, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2006.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2006.
- How does Mozambique rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Mozambique ranks 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.