Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend

IDA blend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 22.1% in 2016. β—† Volatile

Latest (2016)
22.1%
Change on year
down 0.0%
Rank
12th
of 33 groups
All-time high
22.2%
in 2015
All-time low
0.0%
in 2005
Years of data
12
2005–2016

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend, 2005–2016

051015202005201020162005: 0 %2006: 0 %2007: 0 %2008: 0.876 %2009: 1.6 %2010: 2.2 %2011: 2.6 %2012: 2.8 %2013: 2.9 %2014: 15 %2015: 22.2 %2016: 22.1 %

Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2016, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend stood at 22.1%.

The figure is up 759.5% over five years.

Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend peaked at 22.2% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2005.

That places IDA blend 12th out of 33 groups with data for 2016, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.5% 0.0% 1.6% 5
2010s 10.0% 2.2% 22.2% 7

Countries ranked near IDA blend

  1. 9 British Virgin Islands 59.7% compare
  2. 10 Belarus, Republic of 58.6% compare
  3. 11 Russia 57.0% compare
  4. 12 Thailand 53.6%
  5. 13 Iceland 49.4% compare
  6. 14 Finland 47.1% compare
  7. 15 Namibia 45.0% compare

See the full ranking of 208 places β†’

More reference data data for IDA blend

All data for IDA blend β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend?
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend was 22.1% in 2016, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in IDA blend?
The highest recorded value was 22.2% in 2015.
What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in IDA blend?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.
How does IDA blend rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
IDA blend ranks 12th out of 33 groups with data for 2016.
Where does this IDA blend data come from?
The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-male-percent/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-male-percent/ida-blend/">Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in IDA blend</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.