Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda
Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development was 1.05 GPIA in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda, 2001–2019
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in GPIA.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda is 1.05 GPIA, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% on the previous year.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda peaked at 1.09 GPIA in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 GPIA, in 2001.
That places Rwanda 7th out of 173 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | GPIA | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2006 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2009 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2010 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2011 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2012 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2013 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2014 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2016 | 0 GPIA | — |
| 2017 | 1.09 GPIA | — |
| 2018 | 1.04 GPIA | -4.1% |
| 2019 | 1.05 GPIA | +0.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 3 |
| 2010s | 0.3528 GPIA | 0 GPIA | 1.09 GPIA | 9 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 4 Equatorial Guinea 1.07 GPIA compare
- 5 Saint Lucia 1.06 GPIA compare
- 6 Puerto Rico 1.06 GPIA compare
- 8 Kazakhstan 1.03 GPIA compare
- 9 Panama 1.03 GPIA compare
- 10 North Macedonia 1.03 GPIA compare
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development in Rwanda was 1.05 GPIA in 2019, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 1.09 GPIA in 2017.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 GPIA in 2001.
- How does Rwanda rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Rwanda ranks 7th out of 173 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/