Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Russia
Russia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Russia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Russia stood at -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 37.3% on the previous year and down 33.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Russia peaked at -0.0852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Russia 144th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Russia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.8323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.9752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.2% |
| 2000 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.9% |
| 2002 | -0.8602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.6% |
| 2003 | -0.8664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2004 | -0.7803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2005 | -0.9324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.5% |
| 2006 | -0.8308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2007 | -0.7468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.1% |
| 2008 | -0.749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2009 | -0.7879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2010 | -0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2011 | -0.7635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2012 | -0.7966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2013 | -0.7454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.4% |
| 2014 | -0.2642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -64.6% |
| 2015 | -0.374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.6% |
| 2016 | -0.3949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.6% |
| 2017 | -0.3272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.1% |
| 2018 | -0.2818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.9% |
| 2019 | -0.0852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -69.8% |
| 2020 | -0.0973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.3% |
| 2021 | -0.1676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +72.2% |
| 2022 | -0.2577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +53.8% |
| 2023 | -0.2578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2024 | -0.3647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.5% |
| 2025 | -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.3% |
Russia compared with similar countries
- Russia's -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (74 countries reporting)
- Russia's -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Russia
- 141 Gambia -0.4322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 142 Bangladesh -0.4447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 143 Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.4761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 145 Djibouti -0.5285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 146 East Timor -0.5414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 147 Gabon -0.5514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Russia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 31.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 129.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 26.88 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Russia?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Russia was -0.5007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Russia rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Russia ranks 144th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.