Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate was -0.6353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina stood at -0.6353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 1.6% on the previous year and down 167.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at -0.2379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 150th out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2000 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2002 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2003 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2004 | -0.7838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -42.1% |
| 2005 | -0.7211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.0% |
| 2006 | -0.6811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.6% |
| 2007 | -0.7722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.4% |
| 2008 | -0.6884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2009 | -0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2010 | -0.7086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2011 | -0.7322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2012 | -0.5915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.2% |
| 2013 | -0.5382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2014 | -0.2379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -55.8% |
| 2015 | -0.4627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +94.5% |
| 2016 | -0.4139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.5% |
| 2017 | -0.4707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.7% |
| 2018 | -0.6666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.6% |
| 2019 | -0.7937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.1% |
| 2020 | -0.7051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.2% |
| 2021 | -0.8404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.2% |
| 2022 | -0.746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.2% |
| 2023 | -0.6454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.5% |
| 2024 | -0.6353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.5616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 147 Bolivia, Plurinational State of -0.6104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 148 Bangladesh -0.619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 149 Honduras -0.6197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 151 Ethiopia -0.646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 152 Lesotho -0.6471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 153 Tuvalu -0.691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2599 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0577 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8716 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.7607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3142 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Bosnia and Herzegovina was -0.6353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 150th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 167.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.