Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Guinea-Bissau recorded -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau peaked at -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2017.
That places Guinea-Bissau 194th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Guinea-Bissau, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2000 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.3% |
| 2002 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2003 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.5% |
| 2004 | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.2% |
| 2005 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2006 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.8% |
| 2007 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2008 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.8% |
| 2009 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2010 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2011 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2012 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.7% |
| 2013 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.4% |
| 2014 | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2015 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2016 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2017 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.5% |
| 2018 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.3% |
| 2019 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2020 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2021 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.1% |
| 2022 | -1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.6% |
| 2023 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2024 | -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2025 | -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
Guinea-Bissau compared with similar countries
- Guinea-Bissau's -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Guinea-Bissau's -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0583 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3098 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1955 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2346 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1466 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Guinea-Bissau was -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2017.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 194th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.