Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Guinea-Bissau
-1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Korea
-1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
191st
North Korea rank
189th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • North Korea
-2.5-2-1.5-1199620102024

How they compare

North Korea currently reports -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 191st and North Korea ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and North Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau North Korea Difference Ahead
1990s -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2000s -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2010s -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Guinea-Bissau
2020s -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Guinea-Bissau or North Korea?
North Korea, at -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Guinea-Bissau and North Korea?
0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and North Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and North Korea rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 191st and North Korea ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea-bissau/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/guinea-bissau/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Guinea-Bissau vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.